Growing Together: Scaffolding Systematic Review Training for Early Career Health Sciences Librarians
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33178/hslj.2.1.7Keywords:
Systematic reviews, scoping reviews, review services, training, early career librarians, health science librarians, scaffolded trainingAbstract
This article describes a scaffolded training model developed to prepare early-career health sciences librarians to provide systematic and scoping review services. Two librarians, one in their first year and one in their second year of professional practice, participated in a one-year training process prior to joining the library review services team. The model combined formal external specialization activities, including online courses and webinars, with an internal mentoring framework emphasizing supervised practice searches, consultation observations, and feedback from colleagues. Progression through the scaffold was individualized and based on demonstrated competencies. By the conclusion of the training period, both librarians reported increased confidence in conducting review consultations, refining research questions, and developing complex search strategies. Formalizing similar models may support sustainable review services and workforce development in academic health sciences libraries.
References
Gallagher Ford, L., & Melnyk, B. M. (2019). The underappreciated and misunderstood PICOT question: A critical step in the EBP process. Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 16(6), 422–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12408
Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., & Page, M. J. (Eds.). (2024). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 6.5, updated August 2024). Cochrane. https://www.cochrane.org/handbook
Kogut, A., Ramirez, D., & Foster, M. J. (2022). Systematic review training model for education librarians: A case study. The New Review of Academic Librarianship, 28(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1784761
McGowan, J., Sampson, M., Salzwedel, D. M., Cogo, E., Foerster, V., & Lefebvre, C. (2016). PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 75, 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021
Medical Library Association. (n.d.). Systematic Review Services Specialization. https://www.mlanet.org/professional-development/specializations/systematic-review-services-specialization/
Parker, R. M. N., Boulos, L., Visintini, S., Ritchie, K., & Hayden, J. (2018). Environmental scan and evaluation of best practices for online systematic review resources. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(2), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.241
Roth, S.C. (2018). Transforming the systematic review service: a team-based model to support the educational needs of researchers. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 514–520. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.430
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bryn Murphy, MLIS, AHIP, Emily C. Adydan, MSLS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
