Democracy, Complexity and Participation

Authors

  • Patrick O’Mahony Department of Sociology, University College, Cork, Ireland..

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33178/ijpp.3.1.2

Abstract

The contemporary crisis of democratic governance, heralded in opposing political philosophies since the 1960s, carries on into the present. One response is simply to maintain the procedural core of a liberal-pluralist model of democracy. The essay, drawing inspiration from ideas of responsibility emerging from the civil societal periphery, instead follows more radical democratic models in proposing that the status and role of public participation, and with it deliberative democracy, should be rethought. The paper concludes with some reflections on the empirical-theoretical implications for social and political theory.

References

Beck, U., 1995, Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk, Cambridge: Polity.

Bobbio, N., 1987, The Future of Democracy, Cambridge: Polity.

Bohmann, J., 1994, 'Complexity, Pluralism and the Constitutional State: On Habermas's Faktizitaet und Geltung', Law and Society Review, Vol.28, no. 4, pp. 897-930.

Burns, T. R., 1999, ‘The Evolution of Parliaments and Societies in Europe: Challenges and Prospects', European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 167-194.

Burns, T., Jaeger, C., Liberatore, A., Meny, Y., Nanz, P., 2000, Green Paper: The Future of Parliamentary Democracy: Transition and Challenge in European Governance, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

Canovan, M., 1999, ‘Trust the people: Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy’, Political Studies, Vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 2–16.

Cohen, J., 1996, 'Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy' in Benhabib, S. (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, pp. 95-119, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Daele, W. van den, 1992, 'Kulturelle Bedingungen der Technikcontrolle durch regulative Politik' in Weingart, P. (ed.), Technik als sozialer ProzeB, pp., 197-230, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

O'Mahony, P. and Delanty, G. 2001, Rethinking Irish History: A Sociological Critique of National Identity, London: Macmillan.

Eder, K., 1995, 'Die Dynamik Demokratischer Institutionenbildung: Structurelle Voraussetzungen deliberativer Demokratie in fortgeschrittenen Industriegesellschaften' in Nedelmann, B (ed.), Polititische Institutionen und Soziale Wandel, Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft, Vol. 47, pp. 327-345.

Habermas, J., 1993, Faktizitat und Geltung: Beitrage zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des democratischen Rechtsstaats, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Held, D., 1995, Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance, Cambridge: Polity.

Heller, A., 1988, 'On Formal Democracy' in Keane, J. (ed.), Civil Society and the State, London: Verso.

Joas, H., 1992, Die Kreativitat des Handelns, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Jonas, H., 1979, Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versuch einer Ethik fuer die technologische Zivilization, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Kitchelt, H., 1993, 'Social Movements, Political Parties and Democratic Theory’ in Dalton, R. J. (ed.), Citizens, Protest and Democracy, Newbury Park: Sage.

Luhmann, N., 1982, The Differentiation of Society, New York: Columbia University Press.

Miller, M., 1994, 'Intersystemic Discourse and Coordinated Dissent: A Critique of Luhmann's Concept of Ecological Communication', Theory, Culture and Society, Vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 101-121.

Offe, C., 1981, "The Attribution of Public Status to Interest Groups: Observations on the West German Case' in Berger, S. (ed.), Organizing Interests in Western Europe: pluralism, corporatism and the transformation of politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Offe, C., 1987, The Utopia of the Zero Option: Modernity and Modernization as Normative Political Criteria’, Praxis International, Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-24.

O’Mahony, P., 2009, ‘Sociological theory, Discourse and the Cognitive

Construction of Participation’, Comparative Sociology, Vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 490–516.

O’Mahony, P., 2010a, ‘Discourse, Participation and Sociological Theory’, in Bora, A. and Hausendorf, H. (eds.), Democratic Transgressions of Law: Governing technology through public participation, pp. 21-52 Leiden: Brill.

O’Mahony, P., 2010b, ‘Habermas and Communicative Power’, Journal of Power, Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 53-73.

Sartori, G., 1987, The Theory of Democracy Revisited, Chatham: Chatham House.

Setala, M., 2006, ‘On the Problems of Responsibility and Accountability in Referendums’, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 45, pp. 699-721.

Shapiro, I., 2007, The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Schon, D.A. and Rein, M., 1994, Frame Reflection: Towards the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies, Basic Books: New York.

Willke, H., 1992, Ironie des Staates: Grunlinien einer Staatstheorie Polyzentrischer Gesellschaft, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Zolo, D., 1992, Democracy and Complexity, Cambridge: Polity.

Downloads

Published

2011-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles