Cultural and ethical considerations in Obstetrics & Gynaecology: a narrative review

Authors

  • Emma Wilson School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
  • Hannah Whibbs
  • Alyssa Belfiore
  • Hoyang Seo
  • Faith Sumastre
  • Irene Lau
  • Lauren Birchenough
  • Vivienne Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33178/SMJ.2025.1.12

Keywords:

Obstetrics, Gynaecology, narrative review, Cultural considertions

Abstract

The field of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) is integral to women's health, encompassing preventive care, pregnancy, and reproductive health. However, significant cultural, racial, and ethical challenges persist, impacting patient outcomes and equity. This narrative review highlights key issues in OBGYN care, including disparities driven by communication barriers, racial bias, and restricted access to reproductive services. The relationship between language discordance and obstetric trauma for non-English speakers, emphasizing the need for interpreter services and bilingual proficiency among providers. Racial bias manifests in higher maternal mortality rates for Black women and inadequate pain management due to unfounded beliefs about biological differences. Ethical challenges also arise, concerning access to abortion and prenatal screening services, with wide global variation in legislation and implementation. In Ireland, restrictive laws and a lack of universal non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) highlights barriers to informed decision-making. Future directives emphasize fostering diversity in healthcare teams, implementing educational programs to address stigma, and advocating for inclusive policies that ensure equitable care. By addressing these challenges, OBGYN care can evolve to reflect the principles of equity, representation, and inclusivity, ultimately improving outcomes for diverse patient populations.

References

Health for All Policy for the 21st Century. World Health Organisation, Executive Board. 1998;(1998):Resolution EB101.R1.

Sentell T, Chang A, Ahn HJ, Miyamura J. Maternal language and adverse birth outcomes in a statewide analysis. Women& Health. 2015;56(3):257-280. doi:10.1080/03630242.2015.1088114

Hodnett E. Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: A systematic review*1. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002;186(5). doi:10.1067/mob.2002.121141

Truong S, Foley OW, Fallah P, et al. Transcending language barriers in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstetrics & Gynecology. Published online September 7, 2023:809-817. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000005334

Firdous T, Darwin Z, Hassan SM. Muslim women’s experiences of maternity services in the UK: Qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020;20(1):115. doi:10.1186/s12884-020-2811-8

Maternal mortality rates in the United States, 2021. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. March 16, 2023. Accessed December 19, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/maternal-mortality/2021/maternal-mortality-rates-2021. htm#:~:text=In%202021%2C%20the%20maternal%20mortality,for%20White%20and%20Hispanic%20women.

Hoffman KM, Trawalter S, Axt JR, Oliver MN. Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016;113(16):4296-4301. doi:10.1073/pnas.1516047113

Investing in sexual and reproductive health and rights: essential elements of universal health coverage. World Health Organization. Published online 2023.

Abortion access. ACOG. Accessed December 19, 2024. https://www.acog.org/advocacy/policy-priorities/abortion-access.

Khattak H, Tsiapakidou S, Mukhopadhyay S, et al. Variations in sexual and reproductive health services for the provision of comprehensive contraceptive and abortion services across Europe: A questionnaire-based study commissioned by the European Board and College of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (EBCOG) and European Society of Contraception (ESC). European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2024;299:350-358. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.05.026

Wright G. France makes abortion a constitutional right. BBC News. March 4, 2024. Accessed December 19, 2024. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-68471568.

Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy) Act. House of the Oireachtas. Published online 2018.

Boyd S, Feeney S, Harte K, Hayes S, McCarthy C, Hayes-Ryan D. National Clinical Practice Guideline: Investigation and Management of Complications of Early Termination of Pregnancy. HSE Institute of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. 2022;1.0.

Power S, Meaney S, O’Donoghue K. Fetal medicine specialist experiences of providing a new service of termination of pregnancy for fatal fetal anomaly: A qualitative study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2020;128(4):676-684. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16502

Screening tests during pregnancy. HSE.ie. Accessed December 20, 2024. https://www2.hse.ie/pregnancy-birth/scans-tests/screening-tests-during-pregnancy/.

Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2020;136(4):859-867. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000004107

Benn P, Borrell A, Chiu RW, et al. Position statement from the chromosome abnormality screening committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal diagnosis. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2015;35(8):725-734. doi:10.1002/pd.4608

HQO, 2021. Health Quality Ontario (HQO). (2021). Noninvasive prenatal testing for trisomies 21, 18, and 13, sex chromosome aneuploidies, and microdeletions: A health technology assessment. https://www.hqontario.ca/Portals/0/documents/evidence/reports/hta-noninvasive-prenatal-testing.pdf

Supporting women and their partners through prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome, Edwards’ syndrome and Patau’s syndrome. RCOG. Accessed December 20, 2024. https://www.rcog.org.uk/guidance/browse-all-guidance/other-guidelines-and-reports/supporting-women-and-their-partners-through-prenatal-screening-for-downs-syndrome-edwards-syndrome-and-pataus-syndrome/.

Kelly K, Leitao S, Meaney S, O’Donoghue K. Pregnant people’s views and knowledge on prenatal screening for fetal trisomy in the absence of a national screening program. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 2023;33(4):805-814. doi:10.1002/jgc4.1769

Ghiasi M, Armour C, Walker M, Shaver N, Bennett A, Little J. Issues associated with possible implementation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in first-tier screening: A rapid scoping review. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2023;43(1):62-71. doi:10.1002/pd.6278

Rozée V, De Bayas Sanchez A, Fuller M, et al. Reflecting sex, social class and race inequalities in reproduction? Study of the gender representations conveyed by 38 fertility centre websites in 8 European countries. Reprod Health. 2024;21(1):150. Published 2024 Oct 19. doi:10.1186/s12978-024-01890-2

Richard-Davis G. The pipeline problem: barriers to access of Black patients and providers in reproductive medicine. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(2):292-295. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.06.044

Jung C, Hunter A, Saleh M, Quinn GP, Nippita S. Breaking the Binary: How Clinicians Can Ensure Everyone Receives High Quality Reproductive Health Services. Open Access J Contracept. 2023;14:23-39. Published 2023 70 Feb 15. doi:10.2147/OAJC.S368621

McDonald, Lynn R.; Schwarz, Joshua L.; Martin, Stephen J.; Will, Susan Brown; Lawson, Shari M.; Stokes, Tanesha; Riley, Shannon C.; Reynolds, Katie; and Chou, Betty. An Initiative to Improve Cultural Competence among GYN/OB Providers. Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice: 2021;14(3):7. Published 2021. Available at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/jhdrp/vol14/iss3/7

Schmidt, C.N., Stretten, M., Bindman, J.G. et al. Care across the gender spectrum: A transgender health curriculum in the Obstetrics and Gynecology clerkship. BMC Med Educ. 2022; 22, 706. Published 2022 Oct 05. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03766-0

Everett BG, Bergman Z, Charlton BM, Barcelona V. Sexual Orientation-Specific Policies Are Associated With Prenatal Care Use in the First Trimester Among Sexual Minority Women: Results From a Prospective Cohort Study. Ann Behav Med. 2024;58(9):594-602. doi:10.1093/abm/kaae037

Blair A, Cao J, Wilson A, Homer C. Access to, and experiences of, maternity care for women with physical disabilities: A scoping review. Midwifery. 2022;107:103273. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2022.103273

Sharma E, Tseng PC, Harden A, Li L, Puthussery S. Ethnic minority women's experiences of accessing antenatal care in high income European countries: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):612. Published 2023 Jun 10. doi:10.1186/s12913-023-09536-y

Downloads

Published

2025-10-17

Issue

Section

Special Feature

Categories

How to Cite

Cultural and ethical considerations in Obstetrics & Gynaecology: a narrative review. (2025). UCC Student Medical Journal, 5, 59-63. https://doi.org/10.33178/SMJ.2025.1.12