The gappiness in Shakespeare: Performative possibilities

Martyn Rawson

doi:10.33178/scenario.16.1.3

Autor/innen

Martyn Rawson National Tsinghua University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33178/scenario.16.1.3

Schlagwörter:

Waldorf, Shakespeare, Performative approach to L2, Gappiness

Abstract

In this paper I outline a performative approach to working with Shakespeare in a Waldorf school, relating this to Smith’s notion of Shakespeare’s ‘gappiness’. It locates this teaching and learning in the context of block teaching, an innovative method used in some Waldorf schools. The paper offers a theoretical account of the performative approach based on the notion of learning in a community of practice and the immersion in unfamiliar landscapes of practice – in this case working with Shakespeare’s Macbeth- in relation to the developmental tasks of 17-18 year old school students. The workshop process in classroom learning is then described.

Autor/innen-Biografie

Martyn Rawson, National Tsinghua University

Dr. Martyn Rawson currently teaches on the International Master Programme of the Freie Hochschule Stuttgart and is Honorary Professor at the National Tsinghua University. He has been a teacher in Waldorf schools since 1979, and still teaches at a Waldorf school in Hamburg. He has been involved in teacher education for 30 years. He has published widely one Waldorf education, including editing the Waldorf Curriculum used internationally and recently published Steiner Waldorf Pedagogy in Schools for Routledge. He is also a co-founder of English Week.

Literaturhinweise

Bransby, K., & Rawson, M. (2020). Waldorf education for the future: A framework for curriculum practice. https://www.steinerwaldorf.org/steiner-resources/

Erikson, E. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis (new revised edition ed.). W.W. Norton & Company.

Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Harvard University Press.

Gadamer, H.-G. (2013). Truth and method (J. W. a. D. G. Marshall, Trans. revised 2nd edition). Bloomsbury.

Grotlüschen, A. (2014). Neo subject-scientific learning theory. A reinterpretation. In P. Faulstich (Ed.), Lerndebatten: Phänomenologische, pragmatische und kritische Lerntheorien in der Diskussion (pp. 225-258). transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/transcript.9783839427897.225

Havighurst, R. J. (1982). Developmental tasks and education. Longman.

Holzkamp, K. (1995). Lernen: Subjektwissenschaftliche Grundlegung. Campus.

Hunfeld, H. (1996). Die Normalität des Fremden. Heidrun Popp.

Hurrelmann, K., & Quenzel, G. (2012). Lebensphase Jugend: Eine Einführung in die sozial-wissenschaftliche Jugendforschung (11th revised ed.). Beltz Juventa.

Iser, W. (1972). The reading process: A phenomenological approach. New Literary History: The John Hopkins University Press, 3(2), 279-299. https://doi.org/10.2307/468316

Iser, W. (1994). Der Akt des Lesens. Theorie ästhetischer Wirkung. W.Fink UTB.

Jauß, H. R. (1994). Literaturgeschichte als Provokation der Literaturwissenschaft. In R. Warning (Ed.), Rezeptionsästhetik (Vol. 303, pp. 126-162). UTB.

Khan, I. (Sept. 2019) Shakespeare Unlimited: Episode 128 Interview with Iqbal Khan and Barbara Bogaev. [audio podcast] Folger Shakespeare Library. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/iqbal-khan/id1082457631?i=1000450137523

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

Paris, S. G. (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(2), 184-202. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.40.2.3

Rawson, M. (2017). Lernen als Partizipation in Gemeinschaften der Praxis in heilpädagogischen Einrichtungen. Seelenpflege in Heilpädagogik und Sozialtherapie, 2017(4), 37-53.

Rawson, M. (2019). The development of the person: Subjectification and possible links to non-formal learning situations and expansive learning in Waldorf (Steiner) education. Other Education Journal, 8(2), 2-25.

Rawson, M. (2021). Steiner Waldorf pedagogy in schools. A critical introduction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429319679

Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Southern Illinois University Press.

Rosenblatt, L. M. (1983(1938)). Literature as exploration. Modern Language Association.

Schewe, M. (2020). Performative in a nutshell. Scenario, 14(1), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.33178/scenario.14.1.7

Sievers, U. (2017). Creative teaching - sustainable learning. BOD.

Smith, E. (2019). This is Shakespeare. How to read the world’s greatest playwright. Penguin Random House.

Surkamp, C. (2019). Literaturdidaktik seit 1945 aus Sicht der Fremdsprachendidaktik. In C. Lütge (Ed.), Grundthemen der Literaturwissenschaft: Literaturdidaktik (pp. 76-102). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110410709-004

Tyson, L. (2006). Critical theory: A user-friendly guide (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932

Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner , B. (2014). Learning in a landscape of practice: A framework. In E. Wenger-Trayner, M. Fenton-O'Creevy, S. Hutchinson, C. Kuniak , & B. Wenger-Trayner (Eds.), Learning in landscapes of practice: Boundaries, identity and knowledgeability in practice-based learning (pp. 13-30). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315777122