Grammar as social drama
A performance-driven approach based on core linguistic principles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33178/scenario.20.1.2Keywords:
Grammar, Social drama, Interaction, Embodiment, Speech acts, PerformativityAbstract
Speech production is both a physical activity and a social performance. Grammar is an integral part of this process and should therefore be taught using embodied and interactional strategies. Grammar cannot be reduced to its formal elements and treated merely as a set of “rules”, “tools” and “constructions”. Posture, movement and vocal inflection play a significant role in expressing the grammatical meanings and functions that support communicative interaction. Grammar is the backbone of “(il)locutionary acts” (Austin, 1962) and the prime carrier of “locutionary subjectivity” (Lyons, 1995). In this article, we outline strategies for emphasising the dramatic, emotional and interpersonal dimensions of grammar. As learners engage with the proposed materials and activities, they discover how grammar operates socially and physically, and how it expresses the speaker’s subjective stance. They enact grammar-driven processes with presence, fluidity, and emotional engagement, absorbing and de-alienating a “foreign” system of coding and expression.
References
Adler, S. (2000). The art of acting. Applause.
Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Auster, P. (2012). Winter journal. Faber and Faber.
Birdwhistell, R. (1970). Kinesics and context. Essays on body motion communication. University of Philadelphia Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812201284
Bruner, J. (2004). Life as narrative. Social Research, 71(3), 691-710. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2004.0045
Calbris, G. (2011). Elements of meaning in gesture. John Benjmins. https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.5
Churchill, C. (2013). Love and information. Theatre Communications Group. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781784602482.00000002
Givón, T., & Young, Ph. (2002). Cooperation and interpersonal manipulation in the society of intimates. In M. Shibatini (Ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation (pp. 23-56). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.48.05giv
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interactional ritual. Pantheon Books.
Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095141
Gumperz, J. (1964). Linguistic and social interaction in two communities. American Anthropologist, New Series, 66(6), Part 2, 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00100
Heine, B. (1997). Cognitive foundations of language. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195102512.001.0001
Johnson, M. (1990). The body in the mind. The University of Chicago Press.
Kosslyn, S., Ganis, G. & Thompson, W. (2001). Neural foundations of imagery. Nat Rev Neurosci 2, 635-642. https://doi.org/10.1038/35090055
Langacker, R. (2008). Cognitive grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford University Press.
Lacheret-Dujour, A., Desagulier, G., de Saint-Léger, M., Heidlmayr, K., & Isel, F. (2023). The syntactic marking of emotional intensity: Psycholinguistic evidence from French. Lingua, 294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103570
Leacock, St. (1910). The awful fate of Melpomenus Jones. In Literary Lapses. A Project Gutenberg e-book. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/6340
Lecoq, J. (2019). The moving body. Translated from Le Corps Poétique (1997) by D. Bradby. Methuen Drama.
Lyons, J. (1995). Linguistic semantics. An introduction. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810213
MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue. A study in moral theory (3rd ed.). University of Notre Dame Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2000). Phenomenology of perception. Translated from Phénoménologie de la perception (1945) by C. Smith. Routledge.
Miller, A. (2000). Death of a salesman (1949). Penguin Books.
Miller, R. S. (1992). The nature and severity of self-reported embarrassing circumstances. PSPB, 18(2), 190-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292182010
O’Neill, C. (1985). Imagined worlds in theatre and drama. Theory Into Practice, 24(3), 158-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405848509543167
Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/piag91272
Piazzoli, E. (2018). Embodying language in action. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77962-1
Shakespeare, W. (1601). The tragedy of Hamlet prince of Denmark. A Project Gutenberg e-book. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1524
Schewe, M. (2013). Taking stock and looking ahead: Drama pedagogy as a gateway to a performative teaching and learning culture. Scenario: A Journal of Performative Teaching, Learning, Research, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.33178/scenario.7.1.2
Sharman, J. & O’Brien, R. (1975). The Rocky Horror Picture Show. A film script adapted from the eponymous stage musical by Richard O’Brien. https://thedentonaffair.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Rocky-Horror-Movie-Script.pdf
Tolmach Lakoff, R. (2000). The language war. The University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520928077
Turner, M. (1996). The literary mind. Oxford University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (2002). Thought and language (1934). The MIT Press.
Whorf, B. L. (2000). Language, thought and reality (1956). The MIT Press.
Woolf, V. (1988). Jacob’s room (1922). Grafton Books.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jean-Rémi Lapaire

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
